IJPLD LOGO

Manuscript Withdrawal Policy

Withdrawal Process:

  1. At Any Stage: Authors have the right to withdraw their manuscript from consideration at any stage of the submission process, including before or after peer review. To initiate a withdrawal, authors must submit a formal request via the online submission system or contact the editorial office directly. 
  2. Justification for Withdrawal: If a manuscript has entered the peer-review process, authors must provide a valid reason for withdrawal. The editorial team will review the request and determine whether the withdrawal can be accommodated based on the justification provided. 

Editorial Discretion:

  1. Decision on Requests: The editorial team reserves the right to decline withdrawal requests if they believe that the peer-review process should continue. This decision may be influenced by factors such as the stage of review, the progress of the manuscript, and the interests of the journal and reviewers. 
  2. Communication: Authors are encouraged to communicate openly with the editorial office if they have any concerns or issues related to their submission. The editorial team is available to address queries and provide guidance on the withdrawal process. 

Consequences of Withdrawal:

  1. Record Keeping: Withdrawal requests are recorded in the journal’s submission system. Authors should be aware that a withdrawn manuscript may be noted in the journal’s records, and repeated withdrawals may affect future submissions. 
  2. Impact on Future Submissions: While a single withdrawal generally does not impact future submissions, authors should ensure that their reasons for withdrawal are clear and justified to maintain a positive relationship with the journal. 

The Guidelines for Authors section of IJPLD outlines the essential procedures for manuscript submission and withdrawal. By following the specified formatting and submission instructions, authors can ensure a smooth and efficient process. The manuscript withdrawal policy provides flexibility for authors while maintaining the integrity of the review process. Authors are encouraged to adhere to these guidelines and communicate effectively with the editorial office to facilitate their submissions.