IJPLD LOGO

Law, Society and Gender Justice: An Analysis of Supreme Court Decision inX V. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department & ANR.

Authors

  • Aneesha Singla

    Research Scholar, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
    Author

Keywords:

Gender Justice, Abortion, Reproductive Rights, Article 21, Health, Safe Abortion, Right to Privacy, Self-determination

Abstract

Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees the right to personal liberty to every individual irrespective of the gender. Thus, women have the right to make reproductive choice i.e. whether to indulge in procreation or to refrain from it either by denying to indulge in sexual activity or by insisting for contraception. This right to exercise choice by the women is indispensable to her basic right of life and personal liberty. Right to privacy and dignity were another aspects which were added to Article 21 by the apex court in various cases. Viewing these rights in the context of reproductive rights of women, these find mention under international law also. These rights when clubbed together along with the gender aspect, they lead towards protection of every element related to gender identity. Personal matters viz. family, matrimony, reproduction and sexual identity are all interconnected to the dignity of an individual. Forcing a woman to continue with an unwanted pregnancy, represents the violation of these rights further resulting in denial of her bodily integrity, adding to her mental trauma, thus adversely affecting her mental well-being. Denial of these rights especially in the case of unmarried women, amounts to  deprivation of her personal liberty. Thus, in the present case the apex court acknowledged the right to safe abortion of unmarried women.

References

1. V. Kumar, Medico-Legal Aspects of Abortion, Malaya Law Review Vol.6 No.1, pp. 17-39.

2. Dr. Reena Kapoor, Women in Rig Veda - Lesson drawn for Modern Women, IJHSSI Vol. 10 Issue 4, pp. 8-12.

3. Amar Jesani, and Aditi Iyer. “Abortion: Who is responsible for our rights?” Our lives, our health. New Delhi: Coordination unit, the world conference on women, Beijing, Vol. 6. 1995.

4. Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (Act No. 34 of 1971)

5. S.3(2), Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 (before 2021 amendment).

6. Prachi Dutta, “Women and the Law: An Analysis on the medical termination of pregnancy law in India vis-à-vis the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill, 2020” available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/01/09/women-and the-law-an-analysis-on-the-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-law-in-india-vis-a-vis-the-medical termination-of-pregnancy-act-1971-and-the-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-amendment-bill/(last

visited on October 30, 2024).

7. Rule 3B. Women eligible for termination of pregnancy up to twenty-four weeks.— The following categories of women shall be considered eligible for termination of pregnancy under clause (b) of subsection (2) Section 3 of the Act, for a period of up to twenty-four weeks, namely:- (a) survivors of sexual assault or rape or incest; (b) minors; (c) change of marital status during the ongoing pregnancy

(widowhood and divorce); (d) women with physical disabilities [major disability as per criteria laid down under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (49 of 2016)]; (e) mentally ill women including mental retardation; (f) the foetal malformation that has substantial risk of being incompatible with life or if the child is born it may suffer from such physical or mental abnormalities to be seriously handicapped; and (g) women with pregnancy in humanitarian settings or disaster or emergency situations as may be declared by the Government.”

8. (2017) 10 SCC 1

9. (2009) 9 SCC 1

10. Special Leave to Appeal C No. 12612/2022 (21.07.2022 - SC Order): MANU/SCOR/70687/2022

11. Special Leave to Appeal C No. 12612/2022 (21.07.2022 - SC Order): MANU/SCOR/70687/2022

12. Prachi Dutta, “Women and the Law: An Analysis on the medical termination of pregnancy law in India

vis-à-vis the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Bill, 2020” available at: https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/01/09/women-and the-law-an-analysis-on-the-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-law-in-india-vis-a-vis-the-medical termination-of-pregnancy-act-1971-and-the-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-amendment-bill/(last

visited on October 30, 2024).

13. S. 3(4)(a), Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. (amended by 2002 Amendment Act)2022 WL 2276808

14. (2009) 9 SCC 1

15. AIR 2017 SC 4904

16. Special Leave to Appeal C No. 12612/2022 (21.07.2022 - SC Order): MANU/SCOR/70687/2022

17. Special Leave to Appeal C No. 12612/2022 (21.07.2022 - SC Order): MANU/SCOR/70687/2022

18. 410 U.S. 113 (1973)

19. 2022 WL 2276808

20. Johanna B. Fine, Katherine Mayall, and Lilian Sepúlveda 2017. “The role of international human rights norms in the liberalization of abortion laws globally” 19(1) Health and Human Rights p.69 (2017).

21. International Law and Abortion - OHCHRhttps://www.ohchr.org

22. Special Leave to Appeal C No. 12612/2022 (21.07.2022 - SC Order): MANU/SCOR/70687/2022

23. X v. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department & Anr. (Special Leave to Appeal C No. 12612/2022)

Downloads

Published

31-12-2024

How to Cite

Law, Society and Gender Justice: An Analysis of Supreme Court Decision inX V. The Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department & ANR. (2024). International Journal for Public Policy, Law and Development, 1(1), 1-21. https://ijpld.com/ijpld/article/view/3