IJPLD LOGO

The Constitutionality of Fine Imposition Under the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 and its Implications

Authors

  • Ayodeji Emmanuel Aimasiko

    LL.B (Akungba-Akoko), LL.M (Nottingham), B.L, Teaching Fellow, College of Law Antropology & Politics, SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom.
    Author

Keywords:

Constitutionality, Nigeria, Data Protection Act

Abstract

The Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 is a groundbreaking step in knowledge about Nigerian digital governance as it creates a legal regime for data protection and introduces penalties for those entities that fail to conform to the Act. Considering the constitutionality of fine imposition under the Act, this paper attempts to establish whether the imposition of a fine is in conformity with the constitutionally prescribed provisions of the rule of separation of powers, the right to a fair hearing, and the principle of proportionality. To what extent these provisions affect the individual and the corporate organisations forms another discussion of the paper. In respect of individuals, the Act promotes legal consciousness, alertness, and responsibility in data protection regimes. From a corporate standpoint, compliance is emphasised, apart from raising substantial financial, operational, and reputational consequences for noncompliance. Finally, this research recommends that legal modifications ensue to keep the judiciary involved in the imposition of fines.

References

1. Ezeanokwasa, J. O., & Udeagu, D. O. (2021). Imposition of penalties by road traffic control agencies in Nigeria. Lasjure, 2, 94.

2. Olude, I. O., & Adebari, O. M. (2024). Analysing the powers of administrative agencies to impose fines: A review of the Court of Appeal’s decision in NOSDRA v. Exxon Mobil. International Journal of Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy (IJOCLLEP), 6(1).

3. Jesani, A., & Iyer, A. (1995). Abortion: Who is responsible for our rights? In Our lives, our health (Vol. 6). New Delhi: Coordination Unit, The World Conference on Women, Beijing.

4. Williams, R. E. (1966). Equal protection and the use of fines as penalties for criminal offenses. University of Illinois Law Forum, 460.

5. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 4(1) (2023).

6. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 6(a) (2023).

7. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 47 (2023).

8. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48 (2023).

9. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(2)(b) (2023).

10. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(2)(c) (2023).

11. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(3)(a) (2023).

12. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(4) (2023).

13. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(5) (2023).

14. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(6) (2023).

15. Special Leave to Appeal C No. 12612/2022 (2022, July 21). MANU/SCOR/70687/2022.

16. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 50 (2023).

17. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended), Section 4.

18. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended), Section 5.

19. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended), Section 6.

20. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48 (2023).

21. Olude, I. O., & Adebari, O. M. (2024). Analysing the powers of administrative agencies to impose fines: A review of the Court of Appeal’s decision in NOSDRA v. Exxon Mobil. International Journal of Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy (IJOCLLEP), 6(1).

22. Ezeanokwasa, J. O., & Udeagu, D. O. (2021). Imposition of penalties by road traffic control agencies in Nigeria. Lasjure, 2, 94.

23. Unreported: Appeal No. CA/C/244/2017.

24. Sonde, R. D., Raji, B. A., & Eghuruamrakpo, A. (2024). Effect of monetary penalty and traffic law enforcement agents on drivers’ behaviour in Ogun State, Nigeria. NIU Journal of Humanities, 9(1), 35–43.

25. Bhadmus, D. (2023). Understanding sanctions under the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (compliance orders, enforcement orders, criminal sanctions) and the legal options available to a data subject. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4539103

26. Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended), Section 36.

27. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 46(3) (2023).

28. Oraegbunam, I. K., & Edema, T. (2023). The legal regime for data protection in Nigeria: The Nigeria Data Protection Commission in focus. International Review of Law and Jurisprudence (IRLJ), 5(3).

29. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 50 (2023).

30. Oraegbunam, I. K., & Edema, T. (2023). Op. cit.

31. Sahin-Şengül, E. (2025). Principle of proportionality. Concurrences. https://www.concurrences.com/en/dictionary/principle-of-proportionality

32. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(3) (2023).

33. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(4) & (5) (2023).

34. Salau, A. O. (2016). Data protection in an emerging digital economy; The case of Nigerian Communications Commission: Regulation without predictability? Perspectives, 207, 32.

35. Nigeria Data Protection Act, Section 48(6) (2023).

36. Marune, A. E. M. S., & Hartanto, B. (2021). Strengthening personal data protection, cyber security, and improving public awareness in Indonesia: Progressive legal perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics, and Social Development, 2(4), 143–152.

37. Lintvedt, M. N. (2022). Putting a price on data protection infringement. International Data Privacy Law, 12(1), 1–15.

38. De Hert, P., & Gutwirth, S. (2006). Privacy, data protection and law enforcement: Opacity of the individual and transparency of power. In Privacy and the criminal law (pp. 61–104).

39. Čertický, M. (2021). Responsibility of the data controllers in data protection law and the practice of the authorities in imposing administrative fines. European Integration Studies, 17(1), 167–179.

40. Bharti, S. S., & Aryal, S. K. (2023). The right to privacy and an implication of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe: Challenges to companies. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 31(4), 1391–1402.

41. Zejnullahu, N. (2016). Imposition of monetary sanctions as a mechanism for protection of personal data: Comparative analysis of Kosovo and Slovenia. European Data Protection Law Review, 2, 80.

42. Piehl, A. M., & Williams, G. (2010). Institutional requirements for effective imposition of fines. In Controlling crime: Strategies and tradeoffs (pp. 95–121). University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Aimasiko, A. E. . (2025). The Constitutionality of Fine Imposition Under the Nigeria Data Protection Act, 2023 and its Implications. International Journal for Public Policy, Law and Development, 2(3), 6-12. https://ijpld.com/ijpld/article/view/29

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.